Learn how to use ProductLift's two AI-driven prioritization tools to score individual posts against a framework or surface the top five posts to focus on next.
ProductLift ships two separate AI-driven prioritization tools. They live in different screens, produce different output, and are useful in different situations.
| Tool | What it produces | Where to find it |
|---|---|---|
| AI Suggest | Per-post scores for the framework you picked (RICE, ICE, I/E, or MoSCoW), plus a one-sentence reasoning per post. | Prioritize in the sidebar → Score-Based Prioritization → AI Suggest button in the toolbar. |
| AI Prioritization | A ranked shortlist of your five highest-leverage posts against your Product Vision, with an explanation per post. | Prioritize in the sidebar → AI Prioritization. |
Both tools use the same underlying signal: your Product Vision plus engagement data on the post. They cost 1 AI credit per run.
Both tools rely on your Product Vision. If it is vague or empty, the AI has nothing strategic to align to and its output will feel generic.
How to get there: Click Prioritize in the sidebar → Product Vision.
At minimum, fill in the Vision statement, Target group, and Business goals. See Create a product vision for details.
Use AI Suggest when you already picked a framework (RICE, ICE, I/E, or MoSCoW) and want the AI to fill in the numeric scores for a batch of unscored posts, or to sanity-check the ones you already scored.
How to get there: Click Prioritize in the sidebar → Score-Based Prioritization → AI Suggest button in the toolbar.
For every post in the batch, the AI receives:
The AI processes up to 20 posts per run.
Every factor is on a 1-10 scale. The composite score is calculated with the same formula the manual scoring uses, so an AI-suggested score and a manually-typed score are directly comparable.
| Framework | Fields the AI returns | Composite score |
|---|---|---|
| RICE | Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort (all 1-10) | (Reach × Impact × Confidence/10) / Effort |
| ICE | Impact, Confidence, Ease (all 1-10, where 10 = very easy) | Impact × (Confidence/10) × Ease |
| I/E | Impact, Effort (both 1-10) | Impact / Effort |
| MoSCoW | One of M, S, C, W |
Category, no formula |
For RICE and I/E, Effort is scored so that 10 means "heavy lift" and 1 means "trivial". For ICE, Ease is scored the opposite way, 10 means "very easy". Switching between ICE and RICE/IE mid-project will trigger a warning because the same stored value flips meaning.
There is no per-portal prompt override today. What you can tune:
After the AI returns, you see a modal listing each suggestion with the suggested values and a one-sentence reasoning.
The numeric scores are saved to the post. The reasoning text is shown in the modal but is not persisted, if you want to keep it, copy it into the post description before closing.
Use AI Prioritization when you have a large backlog and want a "what should we focus on this quarter?" shortlist rather than per-post scores.
How to get there: Click Prioritize in the sidebar → AI Prioritization.
A ranked list of five posts, each with:
Unlike AI Suggest, this does not write anything to the posts, it is a read-only recommendation view. Use it to decide what to move into your next planning cycle, then score those posts individually with AI Suggest or manually.
Treat AI output as a starting point that a human product manager then adjusts, not as the final answer.
AI suggestions feel generic or off-strategy. Your Product Vision is probably too vague. Rewrite it to be specific about who you serve and what you are trying to achieve.
AI keeps giving similar scores to every post. Manually score 3-5 posts across the range (some 3s, some 8s) so the AI has calibration reference. Then re-run AI Suggest.
Composite score looks wrong. Confirm the factors are in the expected 1-10 range on the post detail. If you see values above 10, contact support with the post URL.